The review should also mention the writing style. Sneddon's clarity and conciseness are often praised. The use of diagrams or visual aids—if any. The book might be more algebraic, which is typical for older textbooks.
Examples and exercises are crucial. If the book has a good number of problems with solutions, that's a plus. The review should mention how the exercises aid in understanding. However, since it's a textbook, maybe the exercises are on the theoretical side rather than computational, which could be a pro or con depending on the reader's goal. The review should also mention the writing style
First, I should consider the content. The book is likely an introductory text, given the title "Elements," so it probably covers basics before moving to more advanced topics. Common topics in a PDE textbook include classification of PDEs (elliptic, parabolic, hyperbolic), methods of solution like separation of variables, Fourier series, and methods for solving first-order PDEs. Maybe it includes special functions or Laplace transforms? The book might be more algebraic, which is
Next, structure and approach. Sneddon is known for clear explanations, so the book might be well-structured, starting with definitions, examples, and then more complex concepts. It might have exercises for practice, which is important for a math textbook. However, since it's a classic, the level of detail or modern topics might differ from contemporary books. For example, maybe it doesn't cover numerical methods as extensively as newer texts. The review should mention how the exercises aid