Potential shortcomings: Maybe the piece is challenging to perform due to the era's complexity, or the edition might be expensive. Alternatively, it might lack modern performance practices guidance. I should also consider if there are other editions available and how this one compares.

Finally, I need to ensure the review is balanced. Highlighting the strengths like the quality of the edition and the fidelity to the original work, while also acknowledging any limitations such as the niche audience or the need for experienced performers if the piece is complex.

Also, I should structure the review with headings for clarity. Maybe start with a title, then sections like "Introduction," "Musical Content," "Physical Quality," "Editorial Notes," "Conclusion," and "Recommendations." Each section should cover the relevant points, highlighting the strengths and any potential drawbacks. Use a professional yet engaging tone suitable for a music review in a scholarly or enthusiast context.

I should also mention the importance of the historical context of the piece, as Frisina lived in a time of significant changes in sacred music during the Counter-Reformation, which might influence the composition's style. The "extra quality" could imply that the edition is part of a series or a special edition, perhaps published by a specific publisher known for restoring older works with enhanced materials.